Do What Must Be Done Lord Vader
- Do What Must Be Done Lord Vader
- Do What Must Be Done Lord Vader
- Do What Must Be Done Lord Vader Show No Mercy
Do What Must Be Done Lord Vader
Add media Report RSS Do what must be done, Lord Vader, do not hesitate, show no mercy! (view original). Chancellor Palpatine/Darth Sidious quotes. Every single Jedi, including your friend, Obi-Wan Kenobi, is now an enemy of the Republic. Do what must be done, Lord Vader. Do not hesitate, show no mercy.
'He's as clumsy as he is stupid.' Ah, Lord Vader, the fleet has moved out of lightspeed and we're preparing to-aaagh!' 'You have failed me for the last time Admiral.' 'Apology accepted, Captain Needa.' 'If this is a Conuslar's ship then where is the Ambassador?' 'He's no good to me dead.' 'He will not be permanently damaged.'
What if he doesn't survive? He's worth a lot to me.'
'The empire will compensate you, if he dies.' 'You do not know the power of the Dark Side. I must obey my master.' 'We can end this destructive conflict and bring order to the galaxy!' Killing people that displease you is not monopolized by Chaotic Evil.Cameron. Admiting the prequils, you allow that Ani was turned from Good to Evil, but can't accept a shift from Chaotic to Lawful? Uh, why?I don't disagree that Anikin was Good or that his alignment was twisted to Evil by Palpatine.
I also agree that he was capricious as a child and a young man. However, Darth Vader's actions in Star Wars Episodes IV to VI show, I believe, very lawful behavior. So if you allow that it is possible that Palpatine perverts Anikin from Good to Evil, would you not also allow the possibility that his alignment may also have changed to Lawful?Does this clarify my question?I used Darth Vader to show that killing subordinates may easily be done by Lawful Evil characters, so my point isn't concerned about what the Ani of Episodes I to III was like (disregarding the moral revisionist tendancies of George Lucas).So, folks: Darth Vader. The original trilogy. Is he Lawful?
Do What Must Be Done Lord Vader
He's trying to RULE the galaxy. To impose the will of the Sith, as an organization, upon all of known space.I think he stopped being Chaotic or even Neutral by the time Padme was killed. He lost himself, and lived only for his master, and his dark side.he lived to serve. Subservience to a higher authority. Talk of high and low, ruling, being the head of organizations.all very lawful.When Luke brought him back from Evil, he brought him back from Law, too. He was a one-man uprising, suddenly very aware of his personal needs and obligations, of his individual wants and desires.But the original saga, at least, is strongly anti-authoritarian in tone, and so is quite pro-Chaos itself. I think he's lawful, because he clearly is comfortable existing in a hierarchy.He has people below him, and people above him and he takes orders (such as his obvious deference to Tarkin in the first film).I also think his power plays WITHIN that organization (trying to off the Emperor and take his place) are consistent with my understanding of a LE alignment.Also, turning to the first trilogy, if you listen to what the adult Anakin says, it seems consistent with this.
Do What Must Be Done Lord Vader Show No Mercy
He thinks the Senate is too noisy, too inefficient, too corrupt.He thinks one man, a powerful man, should have all the authority to govern.Again, this seems perfectly Lawful to me. The fact that he thinks that the most powerful man should rule, and rule with absolute ruthlessness, is where the evil comes in.CHuck.